I graduated from Imperial College, London with a degree in Mining Geology, and then joined Andersen Consulting (now Accenture). After 6 years there, I moved to Berkeley. I have had the privilege of wo...
Juliet Armstrong, Partner
View Juliet now
It's the people that make Berkeley different to other consultancies.
Bright, friendly, down-to-earth people who are both thinkers and doers. Working by your side, as consultants and colleagues, to get the right results.
We’re about being there for our clients when it really matters. When it absolutely has to be right. Doing the right thing is both our ethos and sweet spot. And it’s why clients turn to us again and again.
Whatever your long term career goals, we’re here to support you. Through an open dialogue, we help our people to build the capabilities, experiences and networks they need to boost their careers.
PM Toolbox - Part 3 Stakeholder Engagement
Home > unspun > unspun 29 > PM Toolbox - Part 3 Stakeholder Engagement
In the last issue of unspun, our Project Management Toolbox focused on project planning and resourcing. So now you’ve got the plan and the people in place, we discuss the next item on the agenda - stakeholder engagement. We highlight some of the key principles behind engaging successfully with your stakeholders from the outset and throughout to maximise your chances of seeing effective and lasting change.
We all know that when delivering change across an organisation, we need to involve the people who have a stake in that change. Many of us are likely to have ‘stakeholder management’ in our plans. This typically includes activities such as identifying those people affected and their expected reaction; looking at how best to communicate with them and secure endorsement; managing expectations along the journey; and mitigating the risk of opposition.
However, there is a risk that in focusing on ‘managing’ our stakeholders – where the process may feel like it’s being ‘done to’ them – we miss the benefits of having them truly involved. This can result in poor ownership and poor outcomes.
Perhaps, instead of stakeholder management, we should be thinking about stakeholder engagement? There are a number of key differences between the two approaches.
Firstly, stakeholder engagement involves working closely with relevant individuals from the very outset of the initiative to co-develop ideas and solutions, rather than communicating ideas that have been pre-determined by the project team. The broad set of individuals and interest groups within the organisation should be considered to achieve this.
Secondly, bringing individuals and groups together collectively, rather than picking them off one by one, can create a richer conversation, highlighting issues that may otherwise not be covered or benefits that may not have been identified.
Thirdly, by simply changing the emphasis from ‘management’ to ‘engagement’, you are more likely to focus on what different people need to feel truly involved, encouraging a more thoughtful and personalised approach.
True engagement of stakeholders can lead to the development of more successful, innovative solutions that have broader and stronger ownership, as well as to a better appreciation of why the change is needed. As a result, changes are more likely to be adopted and may well last longer.
This approach is widely used when delivering change in the public sector. For example, the NHS has a complex and assorted set of stakeholders, including local councils, clinicians and professionals from different organisations and sectors, patients, policy makers and the general public. It is critically important (and in some cases legally required) that the diverse groups are engaged from the beginning to highlight challenges and jointly develop solutions. This is a crucial way of ensuring that all parties adopt the changes being delivered.
This equally applies to the private sector. For example, when a major UK bank acquired a well-known building society, the intention was to subsume the brand from day one. However, following a series of focus groups with customers, the bank amended its plans, kept the brand and prevented the large predicted number of customers from switching their business to an alternative bank or building society.
So what are the challenges that come with this approach? It can feel more demanding or more uncomfortable; the result may not be what you expected; stakeholders may be initially cynical; and it requires more time and effort on your part.
In our experience, factors to consider when engaging stakeholders include:
So when embarking on significant change, make sure that the emphasis is on active stakeholder engagement rather than just passive management. In doing so, you will maximise the chances of delivering effective, successful and lasting results.